Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Monday, December 18, 2006
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Sunday, August 13, 2006
Monday, July 31, 2006
This is another image that pushes the limits of what low res jpeg can handle. Weird. I wonder if Google is pushing the compression up to save on space.
Anyways, I was more technically rigorus while I took these photos-- used a tripod and a cable release and I used low ISO. Actually, I slightly over exposed (Without blowing out the highlights) and then darkened the image on the computer. This trick helps reduce noice. But, it also requires more patience. Over exposing means longer shot times which increases the chance the camera will shake and blur things. Since I have to darken the images later, I can't just upload a send. I need to spend extra time with each image to make it just so.
Friday, July 07, 2006
Thursday, June 29, 2006
I've started playing around with Photoshop more. I see why every photographer has it. It allows you to do some pretty amazing things with ease. This photo for example is a composite of 5 photos. I took a very dark photo, then slightly lighter photo, then a lighter photo and so on. Photo shop then merged the 5 photos capturing the detail of each. So even though each of the 5 photos had spots that were too dark, or too light, the resulting photo has a great range.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Monday, June 12, 2006
I've got the new lens. It's very nice but, it's also humbling. If photos don't work out, I have no one to blame but myself. The lens is a good tool, but I still have to do the work to make things look good.
This picture was taken hand held in dim light. The previous picture of the blue ceramic horse was taken with a tri-pod and with proper light.
Thursday, May 25, 2006
I'm slowly getting dragged into professional photography. I do the photography for Chair & Trellis, the store I co-own. Because these photos are reproduced in newspapers and magazines, it's much more technically demanding than my hobby photography.
With hobby photography, I take pictures of what I want when I want. It's nice if I get a few good shots, but there are no problems if things don't work out.
Professional photgraphy is different. I have to reliably take many good pictures of subjects I don't always care about even if I don't feel like taking pictures. Then there are the logistics of photgraphy inside the store which isn't always the best place to take photos. The lighting and layout are for shopping. When you take pictures at the store there are often distractions in the back ground, the shots are too busy, the lighting and the colors are off or ugly price tags are visible. Plus I can only do it when it's quiet and there no customers around.
Frequently, Mark will compose a display and tell me to what angles he'd like it photographed from. Then I'll say I can't get that angle because the camera has to be too close, or too far. Or the lighting is too contrasty.
It's frustrating that the store looks so beautiful yet it's hard to communicate that beauty in the photographs.
Now I'm considering buying a thousand dollar lens and thousand dollar software. Professional quality lenses and software would give me much more flexibility in taking the shots I need and since we are spending thousands of dollars on ads they may be the right tools for the job. On the other hand it's a lot of money. I will feel ill the first time I accidentally bump a two thousand dollar camera and lens against the wall.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)